|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Advocacy
|
|
|
|
Below are various proposals to improve cycling infrastructure in Lane County. These proposals are offered so that cycling receives the level of support commensurate with its personal and planetary benefits.
Arguing for the multiple benefits cycling provides moves the debate from just advocating for cyclists to advocating for the improved national health, clean air, and economic advantages of short distance inner city travel by bike. It is these advantage that are mutual, unquestionable and secure from personal attacks.
Funding is always a challenge. Identification of these problems and possible projects in no way implies the lack of response is due to negligence.
|
|
|
|
Only projects/ideas with three to five stars are listed. Click on each topic to see details. *Means issue addressed.
|
|
|
- Signage for New I-5 Bridge
- PeaceHealth Proposal
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Encourage PeaceHealth to support the benefits of cycling.
|
|
|
|
Importance: *** Resources Needed: * Date Initated: 3/9/09 |
|
|
Letter sent to CEO Mel Pyne requesting support for commuting by bike and for activities that increase cycling among those employees who don’t. Click here to view.
|
|
|
3/15/09 Received from Mr. Pyne note of support for our efforts and commitment to advance the personal and planetary benefits of cycling: “Dear Jim and Colleagues,
Thank you so much for your letter and for your commitment to cycling! As your letter states, there are tremendous benefits to bicycling, and you and PeaceHealth are enjoying those benefits. Via this email, I am asking Phil Farrington to coordinate with the Bike Lane Coalition to explore further beneficial collaboration.
Once again, thank you!
Mel.”
|
|
|
5/1/09 We were able to meet with staff who were very motivated, but there was no formal allocation of resources (staff time for the project) and so staff were unable to make two other planned meetings.
|
|
|
- *Parking at County Bldg.*
 |
 |
 |
|
Importance:*** Resources Needed ** Date Initiated: 4/09 Addressed 8/09
|
|
|
In spring of 2009 we partnered with GEARs (Greater Eugene Area Riders) to ask the County for more parking spaces at the County Building. Obviously, there is shortage of funds, and so our request could have been seen as a low priority. Though it took some time, Commissioners Sorenson and Handy secured the resources needed to add six more bike parking spaces at the main entrance to the court and hearing room, a location protected from the rain.
We appreciate the help from GEARs and the Commissioners.
|
|
|
- *Keep Bike Lanes Free of Leaves*
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Keep Main Bike Routes Free of Leaves |
|
|
| Importance: *** Resources Needed ***Initiated: 1/09? Addressed 8/09 |
|
|
We sent the following letter to the Eugene City Council and Mayor Piercy: “Each year we enjoy the beauty of Fall with its display of colorful leaves. And each Fall these leaves end up in the bike lanes for several weeks. The City of Eugene has tried to address this through public education, but despite their good intentions, there is not enough room on the streets to provide adequate space for cyclists, leaves and drainage. A City diagram shows how leaves should be placed in bike lanes allowing space for cyclists, but the pile of leaves depicted is actually about one-third of the total deposited. Then, over time, wind, rain and traffic move these neat piles all which eventually cover the bike lane.”
“We applaud the City for encouraging residents to recycle leaves on their property. Residents should be rewarded for this behavior.”
“A partial solution is to designate certain streets as priority bike routes and provide regular leaf collection. As it stands now, the City divides leaf collection into geographic sections, which makes the collection more efficient. Unfortunately, this means that routes that are not in that section are not cleared for weeks.”
“As an interim step, the City should designate High and Pearl, (heavily trafficked bike arterials) as leaf collection priorities. This short section from 13th to 18th should not place an undue burden on City resources, and will, at the same time, demonstrate that the City is willing to make at least a modest effort to provide for the safety of area cyclists.”
|
|
|
|
In response, the City Council voted to allocate funds to provide leaf pick up on those routes with heavy bike travel that also have significant leaf collection needs. Here is an abbreviated response from Eric Jones, Public Affiars Manager for the City of Eugene:
“Jim -- thanks for the positive input you've provided to this discussion over the past several weeks. We very much welcome information from the cycling community to ensure that our services are most effectively targeted to meet community needs.”
We offered to help identify the best routes to address.
|
|
|
11/24/09 Update: While the leaf collection program is going relatively well with significant improvements in the amount of leaves collected on priority routes, the public relations component has not fared so well. Letters to the editors in the R-G have ranged from support to rejection of the process, with rejection focusing mostly on the requirement that homeowners and businesses along bike lanes cannot use the bike lanes to dump leaves. In a largely supportive editorial, the R-G referred to the conflict as a “leaf war” which the cyclists have “won”.
Unfortunately, once again the efforts to support cycling have turned into an us vs. them conflict. Instead, the City should not have taken such a sudden turn in policy proposed by bicycle activists, but instead taken a measured change over a longer period. Some of what I call “radical cyclistas” are even demanding the city enforce the new policy with fines for dumping leaves even though practices the City of Eugene promoted for dozens of years have just changed.
Given that cyclists comprise about 5% of the mode share (some say 8%), and even if another 20% who don’t bike support the concept of cycling, cycling advocates must have the ability to see the larger picture that most of the public does not appreciate cycling to the degree of those who participate. As long as some select activists develop a group think mentality that leads to culture wars, the movement to increase cycling will continue to be distracted from its real goal: Cycling is for everyone’s benefit.
|
|
|
- *Hilyard Danger*
- Right Hook Warning Signs
- Lighting at 13th & Hilyard
- *Safe Access to Jerry's*
- *Signs on Hwy. 36*
 |
 |
 |
|
Importance:*** Resources Needed ** Date Initiated: 8/09 Addressed 8/09
|
|
|
At a meeting of a County transportation advisory group, it was suggested that signs warning drivers of cyclists using Highway 36 from Junction City to Mapleton may be a good safety measure. We volunteered to look into how to request share the road signs. Here is the email exchange showing the support from the State for this request:
From: Jim Wilcox To: LYONS Sheila A Subject: bike road signs on Hwy. 36. “Hi Sheila, At last night's Lane County Roads Advisory Committee, a member asked what is the best way to request and receive signs on Hwy 36 that say ‘Bikes in Roadway’. They are hoping for five signs between Junction City and Mapleton. Thanks”
Sheila forwarded the request to a state senior traffic investigator covering this territory, who replied: “Mr. Wilcox, I am the Region Traffic Investigator and I will be looking into your request concerning Bicycle Share the Road type warning signs. Are there really many bicyclists that ride between Junction City and Mapleton? Thank-you”, Kathi McConnell, Senior Traffic Investigator.
And we responded: “Ms. McConnell,My inquiry on behalf of the Lane County Roads Advisory Committee concerns the process for a request. If that request should include a count of cyclists (or an estimate), then we will do what we can to satisfy that requirement. I cannot however, determine what constitutes "...really many bicyclists..." I do know that a club in the area has an annual ride that uses a few miles of this route, with the total number of registered cyclists around 300. If there is specific information you need to justify the expenditure, I am sure the Lane County RAC will do what it can to provide that data, including polling various cycling groups to estimate numbers. Thank you for your consideration.”
Then we received this generous offer of assistance:
“Mr. Wilcox, With your initial email request for information, you have already begun the process for installation of signs. I have discussed with Mike Spaeth, ODOT District 5 Manager located in Springfield, and he is willing to have the Bicycle warning type signs with "Share the Road" riders located underneath the warning sign on OR36 between Mapleton and Junction City. Mike feels this would be consistent with where these signs have been installed on similar highways in the area. Mike has made recommendations to install one on each end of the highway, one in each direction near Poodle Creek Road and also one in each direction near where the Territorial Highway comes in to OR36. I will be working with Mike to have these signs installed. If you or the Lane County RAC have further questions, please let me know.”
Kathi McConnell Senior Traffic Investigator
BikeLane and RAC are pleased to hear the support from the State.
|
|
|
- Quick Response Traffic Lights
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Make More Traffic Lights Respond Instantly to Cyclists
|
|
|
|
Priority: ** Resources Needed ** Date Initiated: 1/09
|
|
|
|
Many bike triggers initiate traffic signals as soon as a cyclist approaches. These should be identified and promoted.
Other lights should be changed to operate the same way.
Meeting with Tom Larsen and Steve Gallop was held in February 2009 to discuss this proposal. Will check back in April for progress.
|
|
- Secure Bike Parking
- Proposal for Mayor Piercy
This letter from the Mayor of Eugene appeared in the February 25th 2009 Register Guard:
Sorting Out Dollars for Streets
When Eugene voters in November 2008 supported a $35.9 million bond measure to repair city streets, they took an important step toward resolving a big problem in how local street needs are funded. However, one step does not make a journey. This has become painfully clear as the City Council struggles to find ways to pay for the day-to-day street services residents desire. We’ve focused lots of discussion and resources on “fixing potholes” over the past several years, and I’m glad to say we are making progress.
But Eugene’s ongoing street services include much more than pavement repairs. They also include paying the electric bills for the street lighting system and traffic signals, striping traffic and bike lanes, making sure traffic signs and signals are in good working order, and plowing and sanding streets when it snows. It’s these and dozens of other operational street services that we’re currently struggling to fund. The bond measure was intentionally limited to a list of 32 specific street repair projects to ensure that voters knew exactly what they were getting for their money. Of course, that means the bond money can’t and won’t be used for ongoing street-related needs, no matter how important they are.
As a community, we are on a journey toward a safe, efficient and sustainable local transportation system. It likely will be a long and complex journey involving many steps and decisions. Please share your ideas. Ask questions. Together, we can find solutions that get us where we need to be.
KITTY PIERCY, Mayor
City of Eugene
In collaboration with Eric Selker, U of O Professor; Joseph McKinney, President of Oregon Roads; Mark Frohnmayer Founder of Archimoto; and Paul Scott from Plug in American, we presented this response and supporting documents on 3/10: Mayor Letter, Housing-Transit Center and Bike Share Program.
|
|
|
|
Life is better with bikes TM
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
“...the politically correct class will tell you that bicycling is important, but they won't actually deliver on that statement.” Dave Snyder, Transportation Policy Director for the thinktank San Francisco Planning & Urban Research (SPUR)
|
|
|